Making Graduation Rates Matter
Lederman, D. Making graduation rates matter. Inside Higher Ed March 12, 2007. http://insidehighered.com/views/2007/03/12/adelman
This article presents Cliff Adelman's ideas for keeping a more accurate track of successful student completion rates without requiring a national "student unit record" as called for by the Spelling's Commission. Adelman explains that such an idea will never get past Congress given privacy concerns, so he proposes an easier-to-implement formula.
First, he proposes that an "academic calendar year" be defined as July 1 through June 30, rather than just the Fall semester, and count first-time students who enrolll in 6 or more semester-equivalent credits in their first term. Many students begin their academic careers in the Spring, and their completion rates are currently not counted. He also recommends that students be grouped into two categories: those under the age of 24 and those 24 and over.
Third, he proposes counting students who enter a school as a formal transfer, likely with a transcript from another school and a signed statement of transfer. Right now, students who begin at a community college are "counted" when they transfer to a four-year institution (and the community college gets the credit), but if those students complete a bachelor's degree, their completion is not counted and the four-year university does not receive credit.
In order to account for traditional and non-traditional students, as well as transfer students and those who progress slowly, he proposes that all postsecondary institutions report student graduations at two intervals - for community colleges, at 4 and 6 years, for baccalaureate institutions, every 6 and 9 years.
Finally, he proposes that postsecondary institutions should be required to make a good faith effort to find students who started at their institution and graduated elsewhere using the National Student Clearinghouse as well as state higher education offices, to help "clean up" the data regarding completion rates.
This article presents Cliff Adelman's ideas for keeping a more accurate track of successful student completion rates without requiring a national "student unit record" as called for by the Spelling's Commission. Adelman explains that such an idea will never get past Congress given privacy concerns, so he proposes an easier-to-implement formula.
First, he proposes that an "academic calendar year" be defined as July 1 through June 30, rather than just the Fall semester, and count first-time students who enrolll in 6 or more semester-equivalent credits in their first term. Many students begin their academic careers in the Spring, and their completion rates are currently not counted. He also recommends that students be grouped into two categories: those under the age of 24 and those 24 and over.
Third, he proposes counting students who enter a school as a formal transfer, likely with a transcript from another school and a signed statement of transfer. Right now, students who begin at a community college are "counted" when they transfer to a four-year institution (and the community college gets the credit), but if those students complete a bachelor's degree, their completion is not counted and the four-year university does not receive credit.
In order to account for traditional and non-traditional students, as well as transfer students and those who progress slowly, he proposes that all postsecondary institutions report student graduations at two intervals - for community colleges, at 4 and 6 years, for baccalaureate institutions, every 6 and 9 years.
Finally, he proposes that postsecondary institutions should be required to make a good faith effort to find students who started at their institution and graduated elsewhere using the National Student Clearinghouse as well as state higher education offices, to help "clean up" the data regarding completion rates.
